CATEGORY OF POLITENESS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK PROVERBS

CATEGORY OF POLITENESS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK PROVERBS

Authors

  • Sadullaeva Nilufar

Keywords:

Cross-cultural understanding, interpersonal dynamics, Face, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, FTA, off-record, PPS.

Abstract

This article research explores the category of politeness in English and Uzbek proverbs, examining the cultural values and societal norms reflected in these expressions of wisdom. Politeness, an essential aspect of human communication, plays a significant role in fostering positive relationships and creating a harmonious social environment. The study analyzes a selection of English and Uzbek proverbs, identifying common themes and unique cultural perspectives on politeness. By examining these proverbs, the research aims to uncover the shared principles and cultural variations in understanding politeness across these languages. This comparative analysis sheds light on the universal recognition of the importance of politeness and its impact on interpersonal dynamics, promoting cross-cultural understanding and appreciation of diverse linguistic and cultural practices.

References

Brown. P., & Levinson. S., Universals in Language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N.Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 8(1978), 56-289. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

Brown. P., & Levinson. S. C., Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1987)

Catherine Njambi An Analysis of politeness strategies in gikuyu: A case of thika sub- county, Kenya.

Eelen. G., A critique of politeness theories, St. Jerome Publishing, Manchester, (2001)

Fraser. B., Perspectives on politeness, Journal of pragmatics, 14(1990), 219-236, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N

Frey. H., Politeness: Theoretical approaches and language practice- Brown and Levinson reviewed, Druck and Bindung, Germany, (1999)

Grice. H. P., Logic and conversation. (In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan, Syntax and Semantics (Eds.): Speech Acts 3, (pp. 41-58). Academic Press, New York, (1975)

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on the Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic Politeness, Current Research Issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14,193-218.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper Colophon Books

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.

Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The Structure and Use of Politeness Formulas. Coulmans, E. (Ed.). Language in Society (21-36). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hamed. A. M., A contrastive study of politeness and impoliteness strategies in British and Arab sports media discourse (Master's thesis), Fayoum University, Egypt, (2014)

D.Z.Nazirqulova. The expression of Linguistic politeness in the English and Uzbek languages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7211848

H.K. Turdiyeva. Xorijiy tillarni o'qitishda sotsiolingvistik va pragmatik masalalar: Xushmuomalalikning ifodalanishi (o'zbek, fors, yapon tillari qiyosida) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348168085_Turdiyeva_Hulkar_Kamilovna_Toshkent_davlat_Alisher_Navoiy_nomidagi_O’zbek_tili_va_adabiyoti_universiteti_o’qituv chisi_Xorijiy_tillarni_o’qitishda_sotsiolingvistik_va_pragmatik_masalalar_Xushmuomal alik

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

CATEGORY OF POLITENESS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK PROVERBS. (2024). «MODERN PHILOLOGICAL PARADIGMS: INTERACTION OF TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS», 4(25.04), 64-70. https://myscience.uz/index.php/nuu/article/view/170

Similar Articles

11-20 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.